Is US Politics About the Money?

In the Beginning

"the" Revolution

In the Middle

Lately

 

In the Beginning

From its earliest days, this country has been about money.
Jamestown was founded by moneyed interest and
Plymouth had financial backers who expected a return on their investment.
The world of Plymouth was just settling down when English religious tolerance increased,
immigration stopped and some inhabitants returned to England.
The population declined, asset  values plunged, and
 Plymouth had one-hundred years of economic stagnation.
The talented moved north to Boston. It was a brain/talent drain.
Gresham's Law that bad paper money chases good gold coins also applies to people. 
A bad economy chased the most talented people toward Boston's economic opportunity.  
See
 
All  Immigrates Welcomed By 1654 New Amsterdam
 

By the middle of the 18th century colonial trade with other nations was flourishing
and very wealthy smugglers like John Hancock did not want to pay taxes for British military protection.
He financed the Minutemen and eventually the colonies won their independence.
 

 

Was the Revolution about the money?

Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton embodied Jefferson deepest republican fear
that some would  sacrifice liberty for the expedience of absolute authority.
Alexander plans for a national financial system which would assume all national and
state debt caused much turmoil as many southern states had paid their debt.
In  addition many of the national and state bonds had been sold by veterans at a discount
to wealthy easterners speculators who would earn a substantial profit.

Hamilton wanted to put the federal government at the center of nation's financial system
to further secure its world position.
He got Madison to end his disapproval of Hamilton's debt plan by agreeing with 
Madison's desire to move the nation's capital to a site along the Potomac River.
George Washington an avid land speculator owned much of this land.
Some in Virginia  charged Congress with an unconstitutional act.  

See Instigators Finely Hit a Nerve With The 1773 Boston Tea Party

Before leaving office Washington had to put down a rural revolt of
whiskey producers who didn’t want to pay taxes
.
In addition there were threats of impeachment because
many felt Washington had broken the constitution when he signed  the Jay Treaty.
Southerners disliked England whose goods thy felt were too expensive.
They also supported France.
The Northeast wanted England's industrial good to expand manufacturing.

President Washington served well and feared a political party system would not only develop,
it would be dangerous. But two plus parties were inevitable.
Federalist like Adams and Hamilton wanted tariffs to protect their business interest.
Wealthy business owner Oligarchs were friendly to England and wanted a strong central government.
Jefferson, Madison and other wealthy southern Oligarchs,
wanted low tariffs so they could buy cheap European merchandise.

This required low tariffs and a Republic run by the people and
not a country tied to Northern manufacturing.

The Revolution Was About The money. 

See Presidential Courage Andrew Jackson

 

 See Educating the Class of 2030

 

See Source 1  and California electricity crisis

2024 Net Worth of Recent Presidents and Spouse

Clinton $120 million

Bush  40 million

Obama $70 million

Biden estate $10 million

Trump

2016     3.7 Billion

2021     2.4 Billion

2024      2.4 Billion

2025 additional $3.5 to $5.9 billion

Legal Liabilities: Trump owes nearly $600 million in legal judgments
including a $454 million civil fraud penalty

Recent presidents from GROK

 

A few years ago well-respected columnist and Public TV personality David Brooks
 
seemed to be acting like Chicken Little.
Was the sky falling?
Was political animosity at an all time.
Had partisan politics reached historical proportions.
 Why were so many respected people saying that the money interest were in charge
 and causing a stagnate Congress?
 I looked to historical political economy for answers.

Recently Mort Zuckerman also a Public TV personality and business person
began talking of the historically slow recovery from the Great Recession.
I was confused. Economic history indicates that our current  balance sheet recession
was very average
and seems worse only compared to recent mild inventory recessions.
 More study followed.

Some say history repeats itself.
 Fifty years ago my father said people change very slowly.
I say they have changed very little since Cain and Abel.
Both are true.
I am sure it is more than just the money,
 but money is always a good place to begin.

 

Please  and e-mail suggestions to antonw@ix.netcom.com  

 

Money and Politics Series

Do People Vote Their Pocketbook?

Four G's of Politics

Is Politics About the Money?

Do Americans Follow the Money